Keeway Hacker 50 vs UM GP1-R 50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Keeway Hacker 50stacks up against the UM GP1-R 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Keeway Hacker 50 | UM GP1-R 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Torque | 4 Nm | — |
| Weight | 115 kg | 91 kg |
| Seat height | — | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.1 L | 1.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | 1-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 |
Keeway Hacker 50 vs UM GP1-R 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Keeway Hacker 50 and the UM GP1-R 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Keeway Hacker 50 brings its published horsepower in a 115 kg package, while the UM GP1-R 50 counters with its own power figure at 91 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: