Keeway KXM 200 vs Azel Wolf 200 (2014)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Keeway KXM 200stacks up against the Azel Wolf 200. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Keeway KXM 200 | Azel Wolf 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2014 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 200 cc | 200 cc |
| Horsepower | 16 hp | 15 hp |
| Torque | 15 Nm | 15 Nm |
| Weight | 137 kg | 135 kg |
| Seat height | 33 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.9 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 110/80-17 / 130/80-17 | 2.15-18 / 2.75-15 |
Keeway KXM 200 vs Azel Wolf 200 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Keeway KXM 200 and the Azel Wolf 200 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Keeway KXM 200 brings 16 hp in a 137 kg package, while the Azel Wolf 200 counters with 15 hp at 135 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: