Keeway Milan 50 vs Kreidler Florett 2.0 RS 50 (2014)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Keeway Milan 50stacks up against the Kreidler Florett 2.0 RS 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Keeway Milan 50 | Kreidler Florett 2.0 RS 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2014 | 2013 |
| Price | — | $1,499 |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 4 hp |
| Torque | 4 Nm | — |
| Weight | 75 kg | 89 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.5 L | 1.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 3.50-10 / 3.50-10 | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 |
Keeway Milan 50 vs Kreidler Florett 2.0 RS 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Keeway Milan 50 and the Kreidler Florett 2.0 RS 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Keeway Milan 50 brings 4 hp in a 75 kg package, while the Kreidler Florett 2.0 RS 50 counters with 4 hp at 89 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: