Keeway RKS 200S vs Adler M 200 (2014)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Keeway RKS 200Sstacks up against the Adler M 200. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Keeway RKS 200S | Adler M 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2014 | 1954 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 200 cc | 200 cc |
| Horsepower | 16 hp | 11 hp |
| Torque | 15 Nm | — |
| Weight | 121 kg | 130 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 4.2 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 4-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 90/90-17 / 110/80-17 | — |
Keeway RKS 200S vs Adler M 200 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Keeway RKS 200S and the Adler M 200 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Keeway RKS 200S brings 16 hp in a 121 kg package, while the Adler M 200 counters with 11 hp at 130 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: