Keeway RY6 vs PGO M2-50 (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Keeway RY6stacks up against the PGO M2-50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Keeway RY6 | PGO M2-50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2016 | 2016 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | 5 Nm | 4 Nm |
| Weight | 89 kg | 102 kg |
| Seat height | 31 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.6 L | 2.0 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Wave disk |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
Keeway RY6 vs PGO M2-50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Keeway RY6 and the PGO M2-50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Keeway RY6 brings 4 hp in a 89 kg package, while the PGO M2-50 counters with 3 hp at 102 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: