Keeway SilverBlade vs Beta Urban 125 (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Keeway SilverBladestacks up against the Beta Urban 125. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Keeway SilverBlade | Beta Urban 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | 12 hp | 14 hp |
| Torque | 13 Nm | 11 Nm |
| Weight | 155 kg | 168 kg |
| Seat height | — | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 3.2 L | 3.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Hydraulic |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Hydraulic |
| Tires | 120/70-14 / 140/60-14 | 120/70-16 / 140/70-15 |
Keeway SilverBlade vs Beta Urban 125 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Keeway SilverBlade and the Beta Urban 125 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Keeway SilverBlade brings 12 hp in a 155 kg package, while the Beta Urban 125 counters with 14 hp at 168 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: