Keeway TX 200 SM vs Qlink XF 200 SM (2014)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Keeway TX 200 SMstacks up against the Qlink XF 200 SM. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Keeway TX 200 SM | Qlink XF 200 SM |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2014 | 2008 |
| Price | — | $2,650 |
| Engine | 197 cc | 199 cc |
| Horsepower | 13 hp | 15 hp |
| Torque | 14 Nm | 15 Nm |
| Weight | 135 kg | 123 kg |
| Seat height | 33 mm | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.8 L | 2.8 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 110/80-17 / 130/80-17 | 110/70-17 / 130/70-17 |
Keeway TX 200 SM vs Qlink XF 200 SM — which should you buy?
Picking between the Keeway TX 200 SM and the Qlink XF 200 SM usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Keeway TX 200 SM brings 13 hp in a 135 kg package, while the Qlink XF 200 SM counters with 15 hp at 123 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: