Keeway X-Ray s vs Lem Recreational CX3 (2007)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Keeway X-Ray sstacks up against the Lem Recreational CX3. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Keeway X-Ray s | Lem Recreational CX3 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 6 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | 6 Nm | — |
| Weight | 86 kg | 45 kg |
| Seat height | — | 29 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.6 L | 0.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | 1-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
Keeway X-Ray s vs Lem Recreational CX3 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Keeway X-Ray s and the Lem Recreational CX3 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Keeway X-Ray s brings 6 hp in a 86 kg package, while the Lem Recreational CX3 counters with 3 hp at 45 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: