Keeway XRAYe 50 vs Lem Recreational CX3 (2008)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Keeway XRAYe 50stacks up against the Lem Recreational CX3. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Keeway XRAYe 50 | Lem Recreational CX3 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2008 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 6 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | 6 Nm | — |
| Weight | 86 kg | 45 kg |
| Seat height | — | 29 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.6 L | 0.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | 1-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 3.00-21 / 4.10-18 | — |
Keeway XRAYe 50 vs Lem Recreational CX3 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Keeway XRAYe 50 and the Lem Recreational CX3 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Keeway XRAYe 50 brings 6 hp in a 86 kg package, while the Lem Recreational CX3 counters with 3 hp at 45 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: