Kentoya Rush-I 125 vs Lifan CT-Ray (2020)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kentoya Rush-I 125stacks up against the Lifan CT-Ray. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kentoya Rush-I 125 | Lifan CT-Ray |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2020 | 2020 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | 8 hp | 9 hp |
| Torque | — | 9 Nm |
| Weight | 140 kg | 115 kg |
| Seat height | 32 mm | 29 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 1.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 | 80/90-12 / 3.5-10 |
Kentoya Rush-I 125 vs Lifan CT-Ray — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kentoya Rush-I 125 and the Lifan CT-Ray usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kentoya Rush-I 125 brings 8 hp in a 140 kg package, while the Lifan CT-Ray counters with 9 hp at 115 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: