Kreidler Florett RMC-E 50 Race vs Kymco Active SR (2008)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kreidler Florett RMC-E 50 Racestacks up against the Kymco Active SR. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kreidler Florett RMC-E 50 Race | Kymco Active SR |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2008 | 2008 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | — | 3 Nm |
| Weight | 89 kg | 94 kg |
| Seat height | 34 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.5 L | 0.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | 4-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 110/70-12 / 110/70-12 | 2.50-17 / 2.75-17 |
Kreidler Florett RMC-E 50 Race vs Kymco Active SR — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kreidler Florett RMC-E 50 Race and the Kymco Active SR usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kreidler Florett RMC-E 50 Race brings 4 hp in a 89 kg package, while the Kymco Active SR counters with 3 hp at 94 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: