Kreidler Florett RMC-G 50 Race vs TGB 101S (2008)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kreidler Florett RMC-G 50 Racestacks up against the TGB 101S. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kreidler Florett RMC-G 50 Race | TGB 101S |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2008 | 2008 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 5 hp |
| Weight | — | 81 kg |
| Seat height | 32 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.9 L | 1.4 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 110/70-13 / 110/70-13 | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 |
Kreidler Florett RMC-G 50 Race vs TGB 101S — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kreidler Florett RMC-G 50 Race and the TGB 101S usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kreidler Florett RMC-G 50 Race brings 4 hp, while the TGB 101S counters with 5 hp at 81 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: