Kreidler Galactica 2.0 RC 50 vs TGB Tapo 50 (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kreidler Galactica 2.0 RC 50stacks up against the TGB Tapo 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kreidler Galactica 2.0 RC 50 | TGB Tapo 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2012 |
| Price | $1,599 | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 5 hp |
| Weight | 91 kg | 94 kg |
| Seat height | 32 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.5 L | 1.8 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Wave disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Wave disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 |
Kreidler Galactica 2.0 RC 50 vs TGB Tapo 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kreidler Galactica 2.0 RC 50 and the TGB Tapo 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kreidler Galactica 2.0 RC 50 brings 3 hp in a 91 kg package, while the TGB Tapo 50 counters with 5 hp at 94 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: