Kreidler Mustang 50 vs Ligier Be Four 50 HR (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kreidler Mustang 50stacks up against the Ligier Be Four 50 HR. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kreidler Mustang 50 | Ligier Be Four 50 HR |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 5 hp | 3 hp |
| Weight | — | 129 kg |
| Seat height | 27 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.5 L | 1.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | 19-70 / 90-70 | 19/7-8 / 18/10-18 |
Kreidler Mustang 50 vs Ligier Be Four 50 HR — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kreidler Mustang 50 and the Ligier Be Four 50 HR usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kreidler Mustang 50 brings 5 hp, while the Ligier Be Four 50 HR counters with 3 hp at 129 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: