Kreidler RMC-E 125 Hiker vs CSR Scoo 125 (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kreidler RMC-E 125 Hikerstacks up against the CSR Scoo 125. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kreidler RMC-E 125 Hiker | CSR Scoo 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | 8 hp | — |
| Weight | 105 kg | — |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.5 L | 1.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | — |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | — |
| Tires | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 | 100/80-16 / 110/80-16 |
Kreidler RMC-E 125 Hiker vs CSR Scoo 125 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kreidler RMC-E 125 Hiker and the CSR Scoo 125 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kreidler RMC-E 125 Hiker brings 8 hp in a 105 kg package, while the CSR Scoo 125 counters with its own power figure.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: