Kreidler RMC-E 125 Hiker vs Kymco Dink 125 (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kreidler RMC-E 125 Hikerstacks up against the Kymco Dink 125. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kreidler RMC-E 125 Hiker | Kymco Dink 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2008 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | 8 hp | 12 hp |
| Torque | — | 10 Nm |
| Weight | 105 kg | 140 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.5 L | 2.4 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 | 120/70-13 / 140/70-12 |
Kreidler RMC-E 125 Hiker vs Kymco Dink 125 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kreidler RMC-E 125 Hiker and the Kymco Dink 125 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kreidler RMC-E 125 Hiker brings 8 hp in a 105 kg package, while the Kymco Dink 125 counters with 12 hp at 140 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: