Kreidler RMC-E 50 Hiker vs Kymco Super 9 AC (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kreidler RMC-E 50 Hikerstacks up against the Kymco Super 9 AC. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kreidler RMC-E 50 Hiker | Kymco Super 9 AC |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2008 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | — | 5 Nm |
| Weight | 95 kg | 102 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.5 L | 1.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | 130/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
Kreidler RMC-E 50 Hiker vs Kymco Super 9 AC — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kreidler RMC-E 50 Hiker and the Kymco Super 9 AC usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kreidler RMC-E 50 Hiker brings 4 hp in a 95 kg package, while the Kymco Super 9 AC counters with 3 hp at 102 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: