Kreidler RMC-E 50 vs PGO TR3-50 (2011)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kreidler RMC-E 50stacks up against the PGO TR3-50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kreidler RMC-E 50 | PGO TR3-50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2011 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | — | 4 Nm |
| Weight | 95 kg | 124 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.5 L | 6.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 130/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
Kreidler RMC-E 50 vs PGO TR3-50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kreidler RMC-E 50 and the PGO TR3-50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kreidler RMC-E 50 brings 4 hp in a 95 kg package, while the PGO TR3-50 counters with 3 hp at 124 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: