Kreidler RMC-H 50 DD Galactica vs MBK Booster Naked (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kreidler RMC-H 50 DD Galacticastacks up against the MBK Booster Naked. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kreidler RMC-H 50 DD Galactica | MBK Booster Naked |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | — | 4 Nm |
| Weight | 95 kg | 267 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.5 L | 1.4 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 | 120/90-10 / 150/80-10 |
Kreidler RMC-H 50 DD Galactica vs MBK Booster Naked — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kreidler RMC-H 50 DD Galactica and the MBK Booster Naked usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kreidler RMC-H 50 DD Galactica brings 4 hp in a 95 kg package, while the MBK Booster Naked counters with 3 hp at 267 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: