KSR Cracker 50 4T vs Rieju RS Sport (2017)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the KSR Cracker 50 4Tstacks up against the Rieju RS Sport. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | KSR Cracker 50 4T | Rieju RS Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2017 | 2017 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | — |
| Weight | — | 93 kg |
| Seat height | — | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.1 L | 2.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | — | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 |
KSR Cracker 50 4T vs Rieju RS Sport — which should you buy?
Picking between the KSR Cracker 50 4T and the Rieju RS Sport usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the KSR Cracker 50 4T brings 4 hp, while the Rieju RS Sport counters with its own power figure at 93 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: