KSR Cracker 50 4T vs Scomadi TL50 (2017)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the KSR Cracker 50 4Tstacks up against the Scomadi TL50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | KSR Cracker 50 4T | Scomadi TL50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2017 | 2017 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | — | 3 Nm |
| Weight | — | 89 kg |
| Seat height | — | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.1 L | 2.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Sealed multidisc |
| Tires | — | 110/70-12 / 110/70-12 |
KSR Cracker 50 4T vs Scomadi TL50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the KSR Cracker 50 4T and the Scomadi TL50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the KSR Cracker 50 4T brings 4 hp, while the Scomadi TL50 counters with 3 hp at 89 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: