KSR Cracker 50 vs Generic Race 2 50 (2011)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the KSR Cracker 50stacks up against the Generic Race 2 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | KSR Cracker 50 | Generic Race 2 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2011 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | 4 Nm | 4 Nm |
| Weight | 88 kg | 88 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 1.4 L | 1.4 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
KSR Cracker 50 vs Generic Race 2 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the KSR Cracker 50 and the Generic Race 2 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the KSR Cracker 50 brings 3 hp in a 88 kg package, while the Generic Race 2 50 counters with 3 hp at 88 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: