KTM 250 SX-F Roczen Edition vs Mikilon M96-250S (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the KTM 250 SX-F Roczen Editionstacks up against the Mikilon M96-250S. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | KTM 250 SX-F Roczen Edition | Mikilon M96-250S |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2011 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 249 cc | 249 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 17 hp |
| Weight | 103 kg | 98 kg |
| Seat height | 39 mm | 350 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.0 L | 1.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 80/100-21 / 100/90-19 | 80/100-21 / 110/90-18 |
KTM 250 SX-F Roczen Edition vs Mikilon M96-250S — which should you buy?
Picking between the KTM 250 SX-F Roczen Edition and the Mikilon M96-250S usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the KTM 250 SX-F Roczen Edition brings its published horsepower in a 103 kg package, while the Mikilon M96-250S counters with 17 hp at 98 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: