KTM 250 XCF-W Six Days vs Yuki 250 TR (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the KTM 250 XCF-W Six Daysstacks up against the Yuki 250 TR. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | KTM 250 XCF-W Six Days | Yuki 250 TR |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 249 cc | 249 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 25 hp |
| Torque | — | 19 Nm |
| Weight | 106 kg | 146 kg |
| Seat height | 38 mm | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 1.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 80/100-21 / 100/90-19 | — |
KTM 250 XCF-W Six Days vs Yuki 250 TR — which should you buy?
Picking between the KTM 250 XCF-W Six Days and the Yuki 250 TR usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the KTM 250 XCF-W Six Days brings its published horsepower in a 106 kg package, while the Yuki 250 TR counters with 25 hp at 146 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: