KTM 250 XCF-W vs Mikilon D10-250D (2014)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the KTM 250 XCF-Wstacks up against the Mikilon D10-250D. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | KTM 250 XCF-W | Mikilon D10-250D |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2014 | 2013 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 250 cc | 250 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 22 hp |
| Weight | 106 kg | — |
| Seat height | 38 mm | 37 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 0.3 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Brake calipers on floating bearings | Double disc. Hydraulic. Two-piston calipers. |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Brake calipers on floating bearings | Single disc. Hydraulic. Two-piston calipers. |
| Tires | — | 80/100-21 / 110/90-18 |
KTM 250 XCF-W vs Mikilon D10-250D — which should you buy?
Picking between the KTM 250 XCF-W and the Mikilon D10-250D usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the KTM 250 XCF-W brings its published horsepower in a 106 kg package, while the Mikilon D10-250D counters with 22 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: