Kymco 150 Styker vs Vibgyor Shark 150 (2011)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco 150 Stykerstacks up against the Vibgyor Shark 150. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco 150 Styker | Vibgyor Shark 150 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2005 | 2011 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 142 cc | 143 cc |
| Horsepower | 12 hp | 13 hp |
| Torque | 11 Nm | 10 Nm |
| Weight | 142 kg | 130 kg |
| Fuel capacity | — | 3.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 130/80-17 | 2.75-18 / 100/90-18 |
Kymco 150 Styker vs Vibgyor Shark 150 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco 150 Styker and the Vibgyor Shark 150 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco 150 Styker brings 12 hp in a 142 kg package, while the Vibgyor Shark 150 counters with 13 hp at 130 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: