Kymco Active SR 125 E3 vs Suzuki Burgman 125 G (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco Active SR 125 E3stacks up against the Suzuki Burgman 125 G. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco Active SR 125 E3 | Suzuki Burgman 125 G |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 124 cc | 124 cc |
| Horsepower | 8 hp | — |
| Torque | 9 Nm | — |
| Weight | 97 kg | — |
| Seat height | — | 29 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 0.9 L | 2.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | — |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | — |
| Tires | 2.50-17 / 2.75-17 | 110/90-13 / 130/70-12 |
Kymco Active SR 125 E3 vs Suzuki Burgman 125 G — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco Active SR 125 E3 and the Suzuki Burgman 125 G usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco Active SR 125 E3 brings 8 hp in a 97 kg package, while the Suzuki Burgman 125 G counters with its own power figure.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: