Kymco Bet and Win 150 vs Ural Retro (2007)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco Bet and Win 150stacks up against the Ural Retro. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco Bet and Win 150 | Ural Retro |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2005 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 150 cc | 150 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 10 hp |
| Torque | 13 Nm | — |
| Weight | 138 kg | 95 kg |
| Seat height | — | 29 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 2.0 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 |
Kymco Bet and Win 150 vs Ural Retro — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco Bet and Win 150 and the Ural Retro usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco Bet and Win 150 brings its published horsepower in a 138 kg package, while the Ural Retro counters with 10 hp at 95 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: