Kymco Bet and Win vs Keeway Venus 50 (2008)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco Bet and Winstacks up against the Keeway Venus 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco Bet and Win | Keeway Venus 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2008 | 2008 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 2 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | 4 Nm | 4 Nm |
| Weight | 110 kg | 70 kg |
| Seat height | 31 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 4.0 L | 1.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 3.00-10 / 3.00-10 |
Kymco Bet and Win vs Keeway Venus 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco Bet and Win and the Keeway Venus 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco Bet and Win brings 2 hp in a 110 kg package, while the Keeway Venus 50 counters with 3 hp at 70 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: