Kymco City 50 vs Qlink Travis 50 (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco City 50stacks up against the Qlink Travis 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco City 50 | Qlink Travis 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 4 hp |
| Weight | 108 kg | 95 kg |
| Seat height | 33 mm | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.6 L | 1.2 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc. Optional drum |
| Tires | 100/80-16 / 120/80-16 | 100/80-16 / 100/80-14 |
Kymco City 50 vs Qlink Travis 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco City 50 and the Qlink Travis 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco City 50 brings 4 hp in a 108 kg package, while the Qlink Travis 50 counters with 4 hp at 95 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: