Kymco K-Pipe vs Husqvarna SM50 (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco K-Pipestacks up against the Husqvarna SM50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco K-Pipe | Husqvarna SM50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2013 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 2 hp | — |
| Torque | 3 Nm | — |
| Weight | — | 43 kg |
| Seat height | — | 27 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 0.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Fixed disc and caliper with hydraulic control |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc. Fixed disc and caliper with hydraulic control |
| Tires | 120/70-17 / 130/70-17 | 90/90-10 / 90/90-10 |
Kymco K-Pipe vs Husqvarna SM50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco K-Pipe and the Husqvarna SM50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco K-Pipe brings 2 hp, while the Husqvarna SM50 counters with its own power figure at 43 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: