Kymco K-XCT 125 vs Beta Urban 125 (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco K-XCT 125stacks up against the Beta Urban 125. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco K-XCT 125 | Beta Urban 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | 15 hp | 14 hp |
| Torque | 11 Nm | 11 Nm |
| Weight | 163 kg | 168 kg |
| Seat height | 32 mm | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 3.3 L | 3.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Wavy | Single disc. Hydraulic |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Hydraulic |
| Tires | 120/80-14 / 150/70-13 | 120/70-16 / 140/70-15 |
Kymco K-XCT 125 vs Beta Urban 125 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco K-XCT 125 and the Beta Urban 125 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco K-XCT 125 brings 15 hp in a 163 kg package, while the Beta Urban 125 counters with 14 hp at 168 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: