Kymco MXU 300 R vs Generic Urano 275 (2017)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco MXU 300 Rstacks up against the Generic Urano 275. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco MXU 300 R | Generic Urano 275 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2017 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 271 cc | 275 cc |
| Horsepower | 19 hp | 13 hp |
| Torque | — | 20 Nm |
| Weight | 241 kg | 290 kg |
| Seat height | 32 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 3.7 L | 3.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | — |
| Front brakes | Double disc | — |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | — |
| Tires | 22/7-10 / 22/10-10 | 24/8-16 / 24/11-10 |
Kymco MXU 300 R vs Generic Urano 275 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco MXU 300 R and the Generic Urano 275 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco MXU 300 R brings 19 hp in a 241 kg package, while the Generic Urano 275 counters with 13 hp at 290 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: