Kymco MXU 300 RL vs BamX BX400-U4 Sierra (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco MXU 300 RLstacks up against the BamX BX400-U4 Sierra. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco MXU 300 RL | BamX BX400-U4 Sierra |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2012 |
| Price | — | $4,999 |
| Engine | 367 cc | 387 cc |
| Horsepower | 19 hp | 19 hp |
| Torque | — | 25 Nm |
| Weight | 215 kg | 266 kg |
| Seat height | 32 mm | 34 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 4.0 L | 3.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Double disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 22/7-10 / 22/10-10 | 25/8-12 / 25/10-12 |
Kymco MXU 300 RL vs BamX BX400-U4 Sierra — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco MXU 300 RL and the BamX BX400-U4 Sierra usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco MXU 300 RL brings 19 hp in a 215 kg package, while the BamX BX400-U4 Sierra counters with 19 hp at 266 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: