Kymco MXU 300 Shaft Drive vs Aeon Crossland 300 (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco MXU 300 Shaft Drivestacks up against the Aeon Crossland 300. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco MXU 300 Shaft Drive | Aeon Crossland 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2010 |
| Price | $3,799 | — |
| Engine | 270 cc | 272 cc |
| Horsepower | 18 hp | 18 hp |
| Torque | — | 22 Nm |
| Weight | 217 kg | 233 kg |
| Seat height | 32 mm | 34 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 3.3 L | 3.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Double disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 22/7-10 / 22/10-10 | 22/7-10 / 22/10-9 |
Kymco MXU 300 Shaft Drive vs Aeon Crossland 300 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco MXU 300 Shaft Drive and the Aeon Crossland 300 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco MXU 300 Shaft Drive brings 18 hp in a 217 kg package, while the Aeon Crossland 300 counters with 18 hp at 233 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: