Kymco MXU 50 vs Barossa Mini AK3 (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco MXU 50stacks up against the Barossa Mini AK3. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco MXU 50 | Barossa Mini AK3 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 5 hp | — |
| Weight | 100 kg | 58 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 2.1 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | — |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake). No front brake. |
| Tires | 21/7-10 / 22/10-10 | 45/70-6 / 45/70-6 |
Kymco MXU 50 vs Barossa Mini AK3 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco MXU 50 and the Barossa Mini AK3 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco MXU 50 brings 5 hp in a 100 kg package, while the Barossa Mini AK3 counters with its own power figure at 58 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: