Kymco MXU 700i vs Arctic Cat 700 S (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco MXU 700istacks up against the Arctic Cat 700 S. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco MXU 700i | Arctic Cat 700 S |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2011 |
| Price | $8,599 | $9,499 |
| Engine | 695 cc | 695 cc |
| Horsepower | 45 hp | — |
| Torque | 40 Nm | — |
| Weight | 357 kg | 313 kg |
| Seat height | 35 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 4.4 L | 5.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Double disc. Hydraulic. | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic. | Single disc |
| Tires | 25/8-12 / 25/10-12 | 25/8-12 / 25/10-12 |
Kymco MXU 700i vs Arctic Cat 700 S — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco MXU 700i and the Arctic Cat 700 S usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco MXU 700i brings 45 hp in a 357 kg package, while the Arctic Cat 700 S counters with its own power figure at 313 kg. On price, the Kymco MXU 700i has the lower MSRP.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: