Kymco Sento vs WT Motors Bilbao 50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco Sentostacks up against the WT Motors Bilbao 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco Sento | WT Motors Bilbao 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | — | 3 Nm |
| Weight | 89 kg | 105 kg |
| Seat height | — | 27 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.3 L | 1.1 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 90/90-10 / 90/90-10 | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 |
Kymco Sento vs WT Motors Bilbao 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco Sento and the WT Motors Bilbao 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco Sento brings 4 hp in a 89 kg package, while the WT Motors Bilbao 50 counters with 3 hp at 105 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: