Kymco Sting 50 vs Pagsta Wasp 50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco Sting 50stacks up against the Pagsta Wasp 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco Sting 50 | Pagsta Wasp 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | $2,149 | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 2 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | 3 Nm | 3 Nm |
| Weight | 97 kg | 80 kg |
| Seat height | 33 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.4 L | 1.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 70/90-17 / 80/90-17 | 3.50-10 / 3.50-10 |
Kymco Sting 50 vs Pagsta Wasp 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco Sting 50 and the Pagsta Wasp 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco Sting 50 brings 2 hp in a 97 kg package, while the Pagsta Wasp 50 counters with 3 hp at 80 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: