Kymco Super 8 50 4T vs Gilera Runner SP 50 (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco Super 8 50 4Tstacks up against the Gilera Runner SP 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco Super 8 50 4T | Gilera Runner SP 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 4 hp |
| Torque | — | 5 Nm |
| Weight | 108 kg | — |
| Seat height | 31 mm | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.3 L | 1.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Hydraulic with Ø 220 mm stainless steel disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc. Hydraulic with Ø 175 mm stainless steel disc |
| Tires | 100/80-14 / 120/80-14 | 120/70-14 / 140/60-13 |
Kymco Super 8 50 4T vs Gilera Runner SP 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco Super 8 50 4T and the Gilera Runner SP 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco Super 8 50 4T brings 3 hp in a 108 kg package, while the Gilera Runner SP 50 counters with 4 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: