Kymco Vitality (2T) 50 vs MBK Booster 12inch N (2007)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco Vitality (2T) 50stacks up against the MBK Booster 12inch N. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco Vitality (2T) 50 | MBK Booster 12inch N |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 3 hp |
| Torque | 5 Nm | 4 Nm |
| Weight | 97 kg | 75 kg |
| Seat height | — | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 1.4 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Disc, Ø 180 |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake). Drum, Ø 110 |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
Kymco Vitality (2T) 50 vs MBK Booster 12inch N — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco Vitality (2T) 50 and the MBK Booster 12inch N usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco Vitality (2T) 50 brings its published horsepower in a 97 kg package, while the MBK Booster 12inch N counters with 3 hp at 75 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: