Kymco Vitality 4T vs Beta Ark Liquid Cooled 50 (2004)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco Vitality 4Tstacks up against the Beta Ark Liquid Cooled 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco Vitality 4T | Beta Ark Liquid Cooled 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2004 | 2004 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | — |
| Torque | 4 Nm | — |
| Weight | 98 kg | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 130/60-13 / 140/60-13 |
Kymco Vitality 4T vs Beta Ark Liquid Cooled 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco Vitality 4T and the Beta Ark Liquid Cooled 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco Vitality 4T brings 4 hp in a 98 kg package, while the Beta Ark Liquid Cooled 50 counters with its own power figure.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: