Kymco Vitality vs Tank Sports Urban Classic 50 (2008)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco Vitalitystacks up against the Tank Sports Urban Classic 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco Vitality | Tank Sports Urban Classic 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2008 | 2008 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 2 hp |
| Torque | 3 Nm | — |
| Weight | 102 kg | 75 kg |
| Seat height | 33 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.3 L | 1.0 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 3.00-10 / 3.00-10 |
Kymco Vitality vs Tank Sports Urban Classic 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco Vitality and the Tank Sports Urban Classic 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco Vitality brings 3 hp in a 102 kg package, while the Tank Sports Urban Classic 50 counters with 2 hp at 75 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: