Lem CX3 SR vs Ural Ranger (2007)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Lem CX3 SRstacks up against the Ural Ranger. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Lem CX3 SR | Ural Ranger |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 7 hp | — |
| Torque | — | 2 Nm |
| Weight | 50 kg | — |
| Fuel capacity | 0.5 L | 0.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 1-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Double disc | — |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | — |
Lem CX3 SR vs Ural Ranger — which should you buy?
Picking between the Lem CX3 SR and the Ural Ranger usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Lem CX3 SR brings 7 hp in a 50 kg package, while the Ural Ranger counters with its own power figure.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: