Lem CXF 3 vs Aprilia Mini RX 50 Challenge (2006)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Lem CXF 3stacks up against the Aprilia Mini RX 50 Challenge. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Lem CXF 3 | Aprilia Mini RX 50 Challenge |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2006 | 2005 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 3 hp |
| Weight | 45 kg | 38 kg |
| Seat height | 29 mm | 29 mm |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 2.50-10 / 2.75-10 | 14-2.50 / 12-3.00 |
Lem CXF 3 vs Aprilia Mini RX 50 Challenge — which should you buy?
Picking between the Lem CXF 3 and the Aprilia Mini RX 50 Challenge usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Lem CXF 3 brings 4 hp in a 45 kg package, while the Aprilia Mini RX 50 Challenge counters with 3 hp at 38 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: