Lem CXF 3 vs Factory Bike Phantom R12 Agua (2008)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Lem CXF 3stacks up against the Factory Bike Phantom R12 Agua. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Lem CXF 3 | Factory Bike Phantom R12 Agua |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2006 | 2008 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | — |
| Weight | 45 kg | 43 kg |
| Seat height | 29 mm | 26 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 0.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | 2.50-10 / 2.75-10 | 2.50-12 / 2.50-10 |
Lem CXF 3 vs Factory Bike Phantom R12 Agua — which should you buy?
Picking between the Lem CXF 3 and the Factory Bike Phantom R12 Agua usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Lem CXF 3 brings 4 hp in a 45 kg package, while the Factory Bike Phantom R12 Agua counters with its own power figure at 43 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike:

