Lem Recreational CX3 vs Beta RR 50 Enduro (2007)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Lem Recreational CX3stacks up against the Beta RR 50 Enduro. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Lem Recreational CX3 | Beta RR 50 Enduro |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | — |
| Weight | 45 kg | 85 kg |
| Seat height | 29 mm | 36 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 0.7 L | 1.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 1-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | — | 80/90-21 / 110/80-18 |
Lem Recreational CX3 vs Beta RR 50 Enduro — which should you buy?
Picking between the Lem Recreational CX3 and the Beta RR 50 Enduro usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Lem Recreational CX3 brings 3 hp in a 45 kg package, while the Beta RR 50 Enduro counters with its own power figure at 85 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: