Lem Recreational CX3 vs Keeway X-Ray s (2007)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Lem Recreational CX3stacks up against the Keeway X-Ray s. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Lem Recreational CX3 | Keeway X-Ray s |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 6 hp |
| Torque | — | 6 Nm |
| Weight | 45 kg | 86 kg |
| Seat height | 29 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 0.7 L | 2.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 1-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
Lem Recreational CX3 vs Keeway X-Ray s — which should you buy?
Picking between the Lem Recreational CX3 and the Keeway X-Ray s usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Lem Recreational CX3 brings 3 hp in a 45 kg package, while the Keeway X-Ray s counters with 6 hp at 86 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: