Ligier Be Four 50 HR vs Kreidler Mustang 50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Ligier Be Four 50 HRstacks up against the Kreidler Mustang 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Ligier Be Four 50 HR | Kreidler Mustang 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 5 hp |
| Weight | 129 kg | — |
| Seat height | — | 27 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.3 L | 1.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 19/7-8 / 18/10-18 | 19-70 / 90-70 |
Ligier Be Four 50 HR vs Kreidler Mustang 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Ligier Be Four 50 HR and the Kreidler Mustang 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Ligier Be Four 50 HR brings 3 hp in a 129 kg package, while the Kreidler Mustang 50 counters with 5 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: