Ligier Be Four 50 HR vs Kymco MXU 50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Ligier Be Four 50 HRstacks up against the Kymco MXU 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Ligier Be Four 50 HR | Kymco MXU 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 5 hp |
| Weight | 129 kg | 100 kg |
| Seat height | — | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.3 L | 2.1 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | — |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 19/7-8 / 18/10-18 | 21/7-10 / 22/10-10 |
Ligier Be Four 50 HR vs Kymco MXU 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Ligier Be Four 50 HR and the Kymco MXU 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Ligier Be Four 50 HR brings 3 hp in a 129 kg package, while the Kymco MXU 50 counters with 5 hp at 100 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: